My topic, it’s enormous. I am still searching for exactness. Like most PhD students, I have an enormous olympic pool of ideas, research, concepts, theories, but I’m cramming them into a wading pool that is my 3 year thesis. It’s old hat to say that it’s a thesis, not a Nobel prize, but the reality of narrowing, effectively throwing out (for the next 3 years) ideas and theory and other work is a hard slog.
I’m finding the focusing stage a difficult time. My topic is the transition to adulthood for people with severe cognitive impairment. I do socio-legal work that looks at how law works in practice (on the ground, the interface between law and people), and what that might tell us about our society and ourselves. So in my thesis, I’m interested in intersections between broad ideas (like what is an adult) as they intersect and are represented within regulatory systems. An example: a person can vote when they turn 18. This is regulated by laws, and these laws are administered by the electoral commission. All of this, the laws, the regulation, the institution, helps illustrate what we think being an adult IS exactly. What is voting? Why is it important? What do we do when someone can’t vote? Even more specific: We got a letter for Daelle about her reaching voting age and being registered. There is a form you can fill out if someone isn’t capable of understanding voting to get an exemption, which means she won’t get fined. This needs to be signed by a doctor. So we (and Daelle) intersect with this system of law and regulation and bureaucracy about voting in a particular way. All of this stuff is our society’s way of defining these bigger shared ideas and concepts.
My project is about where parents and carers of people with severe cognitive impairments (who are transitioning to adulthood) bump up against regulatory systems and law, like social welfare systems, finance and banking, transport, education, healthcare, the NDIS, and guardianship. I’m looking at severe cognitive impairment because it informs us all not only about the lived experience of their carers (as close as I can get to the person themselves) – which is not very much researched and super important – but also because looking at the “extreme” edges more clearly shows us the core of our ideas about what being an adult means, what being a citizen means, what being “disabled” means, and at some fundamental level, what being a person in our society means.
So yeah, like most people, I have some big ideas to wrestle into 100,000 words in a specific format that shows I deserve a doctorate. Like everyone, it’s all about wresting the ideas into smaller shapes, that are still meaningful, and that still represent the big ideas, but that can fit into a PhD shaped box. It’s a mental juggling act. And my arms are tired!!